Insight · Sustainability

ESG in the workplace

The workplace almost never appears in the ESG reports of the companies that occupy it. Yet it affects all three dimensions: the consumption of the building, the quality of life of the people who work there, the efficiency with which the company manages its real estate assets. Bringing space into the ESG strategy requires measuring it – with tools that already exist.

The three dimensions, each with its own indicators

On the Environmental front, space contributes through the energy consumption of the building, material choices and certification paths such as LEED. On the Social front, the relevant indicators concern people's comfort – thermal, acoustic, visual – and the perceived quality of the workplace. On the Governance front, transparency in design decisions and efficiency in the use of floor area come into play, the latter being a measurable quantity. None of this data emerges on its own: it has to be gathered systematically.

E
Environmental
Energy consumption of the building
Material choices and life cycle
Environmental certifications (LEED)
Indoor air quality
S
Social
Thermal, acoustic, visual comfort
Access to daylight
Wellbeing measured through surveys
Fit between spaces and activities
G
Governance
Efficiency in the use of floor area
Standard area measurement (BOMA)
Traceability of design choices
Reporting in disclosures
The workplace touches all three ESG dimensions, each with its own indicators

Measuring wellbeing: interviews, surveys, usage data

The Social pillar of ESG is about people. But "employee wellbeing" is a statement. To make it measurable you need structured interviews and surveys: with our survey we reconstruct the typical day of each team, gathering quality of comfort, fit between spaces and activities, expressed and latent needs. The result is a set of data that captures the current state and can be repeated over time to measure progress after a project. That same data feeds the sizing of work settings and the choice of the desk sharing ratio.

LowHigh
Efficiency in the use of floor areaBOMA standard · Governance
Perceived comfortStructured survey · Social
Access to daylightFloor plan survey · Social
Environmental certificationsLEED · Environmental
Indoor air qualityMonitoring · Environmental
Sample indicators: each piece of data about the space is gathered with a dedicated tool and becomes measurable over time

Efficiency and governance: the BOMA standard

How many people does this space really hold, relative to its floor area? The answer depends on how the areas are measured. The BOMA standard (Building Owners and Managers Association) provides shared criteria for measuring areas – distinguishing work areas, support areas and common spaces – and makes it possible to compare the efficiency of different spaces on an objective basis. Applying it means having clean data on the use of real estate assets, useful in sustainability reports and in space optimisation decisions that bear on the Governance letter of ESG.

Work areas Work areas Support Support Common Common spaces AREA BREAKDOWN Work areas Support areas Common spaces
The BOMA standard distinguishes areas by type of use: an objective basis for comparing the efficiency of spaces

ESG in production too

ESG goals also run through production buildings: consumption, materials, the quality of the working environments on the shop floor. A sustainable, well-managed industrial building is part of the strategy. See Industrial architecture: the industrial building as a project.

How do you measure your space's contribution to the ESG strategy?

Our survey gathers comfort, fit and real use of spaces: it is the first step to bringing concrete data into your sustainability report.

Further reading

Back to Insight